MENU
Anatomy
Anesthesiology
Biochemistry
Biomedical Informatics
Biophysics
Cell Biology
Clinical Cases
Dentistry
Dermatovenerology
Emergency Medicine
Family Medicine
Forensic Medicine
Gynecology and Obstetrics
Histology and Embryology
History of Medicine
Human Genetics
Hygiene
Infectious Diseases
Internal Medicine
Medical Deontology and Philosophy
Medical Psychology
Microbiology and Immunology
Neurology
Occupational Medicine
Oncology
Ophthalmology
Orthopaedics
Otorhinolaryngology
Pathology
Pathophysiology
Pediatrics
Pharmacology and Experimental Toxicology
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Physiology
Psychiatry
Radiology
Social Medicine
Surgery
Toxicology
Research papers
Clinical research paper
Preclinical research paper
Sponsored articles
Archive » 2004 » 3 » | Archive » Medical field » Fields » Forensic Medicine » Archive » Medical field » Fields » Occupational Medicine » Archive » Medical field » Fields » Surgery »

Climbing Rope Falls: Does the Type of Harness Influence Pattern and Severity of Injury?

 
Abstract:

This post is also available in: enEnglish slSlovenščina (Slovenian)

Based on experimental data, it is widely believed that any extended climbing rope fall may cause life-threatening injuries when using a sit harness alone. This is mainly due to the danger of thoraco-lumbar spinal and visceral abdominal injuries secondary to hyperextension trauma, as well as the risk of a »head down« position during suspension. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify whether the pattern of injury suggested by experimental data is indeed found in real life falls and whether the type of harness used contributes to mor­bidity and mortality in climbing accident victims. A total of 57 climbers with a history of a fall into the climbing rope were analysed, 41 using a sit harness alone and 16 using a combina­tion of sit and chest harness. Neither a disruption of the thoraco-lumbar spinal nor abdominal visceral injuries secondary to hyperextension trauma were found in any of our victims using a sit harness alone, despite long falls up to 65 meters. The pattern and sever­ity of injury were not different in climbers using a sit harness alone when compared to those using a combination of sit and chest harness. »Head first« position was common during the fall (33% of all cases), but without any correlation to the type of harness used. »Head down« position after the fall during suspension was less common and found only when no chest harness was used. There was a peak of life threatening injuries and multi-system-trauma cases in routes of low difficulty, the pattern of injury indicating rock contact during the fall as the underling mechanism responsible for these injuries. Taken together, we did not find any evi­dence that the type of harness used significantly influences the pattern or severity of injury in rock climbing accidents. Our data indicate that severe and life threatening injuries in rock climbing accidents are predominantly due to rock contact during the fall and are more com­mon in routes of low difficulty.
Authors:
Peter Mair, Martin Lutz

Keywords:


Cite as:
Med Razgl. 2004; 43: 313–17.

Download PDF >>
© 2019 Društvo Medicinski razgledi | Na vrh strani / To top ↑